Wednesday 23 September 2026

Field desk · UK · 2026

Firm Spotlights

Friday 7 August 2026

· 3 min read

For Traders Marks Three Years With Four Challenge Paths at 80% Split

For Traders turns three this year with a full catalog of four challenge types — One-Step, Two-Step, Strike 3-Step, and Instant — each offering an 80% profit split on accounts up to $100K.

Editorial Team

Editorial Team

Prop Weekly Editorial
For Traders Marks Three Years With Four Challenge Paths at 80% Split - Prop Weekly

For Traders, the evaluation and education firm founded in 2023, marks its third year of operation this month with a catalog of four distinct challenge paths — One-Step, Two-Step, Strike 3-Step, and Instant — all priced across account sizes from $3,000 to $100,000 and each carrying an 80% trader profit split.

Background and Challenge Catalog

Launched in 2023, For Traders positions itself as both an evaluation provider and an educational resource, publishing daily strategy guides and rule explainers on its blog. The firm's current catalog spans four evaluation models:

  • One-Step Challenge — single-phase evaluation with a 9% profit target, 3% daily drawdown, and 6% trailing max drawdown.
  • Two-Step Challenge — Phase 1 at 8% target with 4% daily and 8% static max drawdown; Phase 2 at 5% target with identical drawdown limits.
  • Strike 3-Step Challenge — three phases at 4%, 4%, and 8% targets, each with 3% daily and 5% max drawdown measured on both percentage and static bases.
  • Instant Funding — no profit target; traders enter a live funded phase directly with 3% daily and 5% max drawdown (percentage and static).

Account sizes range from $6,000 to $100,000 on the first three challenges, while Instant adds a $3,000 entry tier. Prices scale accordingly: the One-Step $100K account costs $469; Two-Step $100K is $569; Strike 3-Step $100K is $349; Instant $100K is $699.

Evaluation Rules and Drawdown Mechanics

Drawdown measurement varies by product. The One-Step uses a trailing max drawdown that locks in as equity peaks — a stricter mechanic that raises the floor with every unrealized high. The Two-Step applies static max drawdown in both phases, keeping the floor fixed from the starting balance. Strike 3-Step and Instant employ both percentage-based and static drawdown calculations, meaning the floor can move on either closed balance or open equity depending on the phase.

Daily loss limits are static across all challenges: 3% on One-Step, Strike, and Instant; 4% on Two-Step. Minimum trading days are not explicitly published in the current rule set, though the firm's educational content notes most programs require 5–10 active days per cycle.

Platforms, Payout Split, and Competitive Position

Traders can execute on cTrader, MetaTrader (MT4/MT5), or TradeLocker — a three-platform spread that covers the majority of retail prop preferences. The 80% profit split applies uniformly across all challenge types and account sizes. Industry benchmarks place the standard trader split at 80% with a competitive range of 80–90%; For Traders sits at the floor of that range. The firm's own blog notes that "profit splits in 2026 range from 70/30 to 90/10, with 80/20 in the trader's favour being the industry norm for standard programs." Payout frequency and minimum withdrawal thresholds are not detailed in the current public data.

Why It Matters This Week

The three-year milestone coincides with a run of fresh educational content on the firm's site — July 2026 posts cover withdrawal mechanics, a Lucid Trading payout policy breakdown, a strategy guide for challenge pass rates, and a comprehensive rule dictionary. For traders comparing firms, the combination of four evaluation structures at a single price tier per size, multi-platform access, and an 80% split at the industry baseline makes For Traders a reference point for standard-market terms.

Read more industry news at Prop Weekly.

Comments

(0)

Join the discussion. You can write a comment anytime - you will be asked to sign in when you post.

No comments yet. Be the first.

Editorial Team

Written by

Editorial Team

Prop Weekly Editorial


Related stories

Most read

Get the weekly wrap

One email a week: the stories, the rule changes we logged, and the firms whose traffic moved. No spam, unsubscribe any time.


All information provided on this site is intended solely for educational purposes related to trading on financial markets and does not serve in any way as a specific investment recommendation, business recommendation, investment opportunity analysis, or similar general recommendation regarding the trading of investment instruments.Prop Weekly is an independent editorial publication covering the proprietary trading industry and provides news, analysis, and educational content only. We do not operate as a proprietary trading firm, broker, or custodian, do not offer simulated trading accounts or evaluations, and do not provide execution or custody of funds.The information on this site is not directed at residents in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local laws or regulations.
Also from the Prop Firm Pal network: Find a prop firm · Create a prop firm - Prop Weekly is editorially independent.© 2026 Prop Weekly. All rights reserved.